pith. sign in

hub

Analysing mathematical reasoning abilities of neural models

18 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

18 Pith papers citing it
abstract

Mathematical reasoning---a core ability within human intelligence---presents some unique challenges as a domain: we do not come to understand and solve mathematical problems primarily on the back of experience and evidence, but on the basis of inferring, learning, and exploiting laws, axioms, and symbol manipulation rules. In this paper, we present a new challenge for the evaluation (and eventually the design) of neural architectures and similar system, developing a task suite of mathematics problems involving sequential questions and answers in a free-form textual input/output format. The structured nature of the mathematics domain, covering arithmetic, algebra, probability and calculus, enables the construction of training and test splits designed to clearly illuminate the capabilities and failure-modes of different architectures, as well as evaluate their ability to compose and relate knowledge and learned processes. Having described the data generation process and its potential future expansions, we conduct a comprehensive analysis of models from two broad classes of the most powerful sequence-to-sequence architectures and find notable differences in their ability to resolve mathematical problems and generalize their knowledge.

hub tools

citation-role summary

background 3

citation-polarity summary

roles

background 3

polarities

background 3

representative citing papers

The Pile: An 800GB Dataset of Diverse Text for Language Modeling

cs.CL · 2020-12-31 · conditional · novelty 8.0

The Pile is a newly constructed 825 GiB dataset from 22 diverse sources that enables language models to achieve better performance on academic, professional, and cross-domain tasks than models trained on Common Crawl variants.

Scaling Laws for Autoregressive Generative Modeling

cs.LG · 2020-10-28 · accept · novelty 7.0

Autoregressive transformers follow power-law scaling laws for cross-entropy loss with nearly universal exponents relating optimal model size to compute budget across four domains.

Scaling Laws for Transfer

cs.LG · 2021-02-02 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

Effective data transferred from pre-training to fine-tuning is described by a power law in model parameter count and fine-tuning dataset size, acting like a multiplier on the fine-tuning data.

Learning to Theorize the World from Observation

cs.LG · 2026-05-05 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

NEO induces compositional latent programs as world theories from observations and executes them to enable explanation-driven generalization.

HybridFlow: A Flexible and Efficient RLHF Framework

cs.LG · 2024-09-28 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

HybridFlow combines single- and multi-controller paradigms with a 3D-HybridEngine to deliver 1.53x to 20.57x higher throughput for various RLHF algorithms compared to prior systems.

Language Models (Mostly) Know What They Know

cs.CL · 2022-07-11 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

Language models show good calibration when asked to estimate the probability that their own answers are correct, with performance improving as models get larger.

citing papers explorer

Showing 18 of 18 citing papers.