Evolving-RL jointly optimizes experience extraction and utilization in LLM agents via RL with separate evaluation signals, delivering up to 98.7% relative gains on out-of-distribution tasks in ALFWorld and Mind2Web.
Canonical reference
Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2023 , month = jul, year =
Canonical reference. 100% of citing Pith papers cite this work as background.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
roles
background 6polarities
background 6representative citing papers
Uncertainty trace profiles from LM reasoning traces predict correct final answers with AUROC up to 0.807 and enable early error detection using only initial tokens.
Teachers' views on AI benefits and risks vary widely across 55 countries, but LLMs compress these differences, overestimate both sides, and show little improvement from country prompting or better reasoning.
Math-Shepherd is an automatically trained process reward model that scores solution steps to verify and reinforce LLMs, lifting Mistral-7B from 77.9% to 89.1% on GSM8K and 28.6% to 43.5% on MATH.
GRC unifies generation, retrieval, and compression in LLMs via meta latent tokens for single-pass execution with modular flexibility.
The paper unifies perspectives on Long CoT in reasoning LLMs by introducing a taxonomy, detailing characteristics of deep reasoning and reflection, and discussing emergence phenomena and future directions.
LLM accuracy on reasoning tasks differs significantly by question type, with step-by-step reasoning accuracy often uncorrelated to final answer selection.
A survey on LLM-as-a-Judge that reviews reliability strategies, proposes evaluation methods, and introduces a novel benchmark for assessing such systems.
A literature survey synthesizing benchmarks, architectures, training strategies, and evaluation methods for mathematical reasoning in LLMs, based on roughly 120 papers.
citing papers explorer
-
Evolving-RL: End-to-End Optimization of Experience-Driven Self-Evolving Capability within Agents
Evolving-RL jointly optimizes experience extraction and utilization in LLM agents via RL with separate evaluation signals, delivering up to 98.7% relative gains on out-of-distribution tasks in ALFWorld and Mind2Web.
-
Tracing Uncertainty in Language Model "Reasoning"
Uncertainty trace profiles from LM reasoning traces predict correct final answers with AUROC up to 0.807 and enable early error detection using only initial tokens.
-
Teachers' Perceived Benefits and Risks of AI Across Fifty-Five Countries: An Audit of LLM Alignment and Steerability
Teachers' views on AI benefits and risks vary widely across 55 countries, but LLMs compress these differences, overestimate both sides, and show little improvement from country prompting or better reasoning.
-
Math-Shepherd: Verify and Reinforce LLMs Step-by-step without Human Annotations
Math-Shepherd is an automatically trained process reward model that scores solution steps to verify and reinforce LLMs, lifting Mistral-7B from 77.9% to 89.1% on GSM8K and 28.6% to 43.5% on MATH.
-
GRC: Unifying Reasoning-Driven Generation, Retrieval and Compression
GRC unifies generation, retrieval, and compression in LLMs via meta latent tokens for single-pass execution with modular flexibility.
-
Towards Reasoning Era: A Survey of Long Chain-of-Thought for Reasoning Large Language Models
The paper unifies perspectives on Long CoT in reasoning LLMs by introducing a taxonomy, detailing characteristics of deep reasoning and reflection, and discussing emergence phenomena and future directions.
-
Is Large Language Model Performance on Reasoning Tasks Impacted by Different Ways Questions Are Asked?
LLM accuracy on reasoning tasks differs significantly by question type, with step-by-step reasoning accuracy often uncorrelated to final answer selection.
-
A Survey on LLM-as-a-Judge
A survey on LLM-as-a-Judge that reviews reliability strategies, proposes evaluation methods, and introduces a novel benchmark for assessing such systems.
-
Mathematical Reasoning in Large Language Models: Benchmarks, Architectures, Evaluation, and Open Challenges
A literature survey synthesizing benchmarks, architectures, training strategies, and evaluation methods for mathematical reasoning in LLMs, based on roughly 120 papers.