An open-access web calculator forecasts when quantum computers will beat price-equivalent classical machines, and its robustness analysis shows Shor-style advantage dates are stable while Grover-style dates depend heavily on user assumptions.
Efficient Networks for Quantum Factoring
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
We consider how to optimize memory use and computation time in operating a quantum computer. In particular, we estimate the number of memory qubits and the number of operations required to perform factorization, using the algorithm suggested by Shor. A $K$-bit number can be factored in time of order $K^3$ using a machine capable of storing $5K+1$ qubits. Evaluation of the modular exponential function (the bottleneck of Shor's algorithm) could be achieved with about $72 K^3$ elementary quantum gates; implementation using a linear ion trap would require about $396 K^3$ laser pulses. A proof-of-principle demonstration of quantum factoring (factorization of 15) could be performed with only 6 trapped ions and 38 laser pulses. Though the ion trap may never be a useful computer, it will be a powerful device for exploring experimentally the properties of entangled quantum states.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
fields
quant-ph 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1roles
background 1polarities
unclear 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Introducing the Quantum Economic Advantage Online Calculator
An open-access web calculator forecasts when quantum computers will beat price-equivalent classical machines, and its robustness analysis shows Shor-style advantage dates are stable while Grover-style dates depend heavily on user assumptions.