Proposes a dual static-analysis and dynamic-testing framework to evaluate and reduce assessment vulnerability to generative AI, but provides no empirical validation.
A Transparency Index Framework for AI in Education
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
Numerous AI ethics checklists and frameworks have been proposed focusing on different dimensions of ethical AI such as fairness, explainability, and safety. Yet, no such work has been done on developing transparent AI systems for real-world educational scenarios. This paper presents a Transparency Index framework that has been iteratively co-designed with different stakeholders of AI in education, including educators, ed-tech experts, and AI practitioners. We map the requirements of transparency for different categories of stakeholders of AI in education and demonstrate that transparency considerations are embedded in the entire AI development process from the data collection stage until the AI system is deployed in the real world and iteratively improved. We also demonstrate how transparency enables the implementation of other ethical AI dimensions in Education like interpretability, accountability, and safety. In conclusion, we discuss the directions for future research in this newly emerging field. The main contribution of this study is that it highlights the importance of transparency in developing AI-powered educational technologies and proposes an index framework for its conceptualization for AI in education.
fields
cs.CY 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Machine vs Machine: Using AI to Tackle Generative AI Threats in Assessment
Proposes a dual static-analysis and dynamic-testing framework to evaluate and reduce assessment vulnerability to generative AI, but provides no empirical validation.