Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

A Transparency Index Framework for AI in Education

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2206.03220 v1 pith:W2FNEKR3 submitted 2022-05-09 cs.CY cs.AI

classification cs.CYcs.AI
keywords transparencyeducationbeendifferentframeworkindexdemonstratedeveloping
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Numerous AI ethics checklists and frameworks have been proposed focusing on different dimensions of ethical AI such as fairness, explainability, and safety. Yet, no such work has been done on developing transparent AI systems for real-world educational scenarios. This paper presents a Transparency Index framework that has been iteratively co-designed with different stakeholders of AI in education, including educators, ed-tech experts, and AI practitioners. We map the requirements of transparency for different categories of stakeholders of AI in education and demonstrate that transparency considerations are embedded in the entire AI development process from the data collection stage until the AI system is deployed in the real world and iteratively improved. We also demonstrate how transparency enables the implementation of other ethical AI dimensions in Education like interpretability, accountability, and safety. In conclusion, we discuss the directions for future research in this newly emerging field. The main contribution of this study is that it highlights the importance of transparency in developing AI-powered educational technologies and proposes an index framework for its conceptualization for AI in education.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Machine vs Machine: Using AI to Tackle Generative AI Threats in Assessment

    cs.CY 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Proposes a dual static-analysis and dynamic-testing framework to evaluate and reduce assessment vulnerability to generative AI, but provides no empirical validation.

Pith tools