Models trained on individual judges' past child-custody rulings predict those judges' future rulings better than a model trained on all judges together, a result the paper reads as support for legal realism.
Legal Judgment Prediction via Multi-Perspective Bi-Feedback Network
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
The Legal Judgment Prediction (LJP) is to determine judgment results based on the fact descriptions of the cases. LJP usually consists of multiple subtasks, such as applicable law articles prediction, charges prediction, and the term of the penalty prediction. These multiple subtasks have topological dependencies, the results of which affect and verify each other. However, existing methods use dependencies of results among multiple subtasks inefficiently. Moreover, for cases with similar descriptions but different penalties, current methods cannot predict accurately because the word collocation information is ignored. In this paper, we propose a Multi-Perspective Bi-Feedback Network with the Word Collocation Attention mechanism based on the topology structure among subtasks. Specifically, we design a multi-perspective forward prediction and backward verification framework to utilize result dependencies among multiple subtasks effectively. To distinguish cases with similar descriptions but different penalties, we integrate word collocations features of fact descriptions into the network via an attention mechanism. The experimental results show our model achieves significant improvements over baselines on all prediction tasks.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
fields
cs.CL 1years
2025 1verdicts
REJECT 1roles
background 1polarities
background 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
The Judge Variable: Challenging Judge-Agnostic Legal Judgment Prediction
Models trained on individual judges' past child-custody rulings predict those judges' future rulings better than a model trained on all judges together, a result the paper reads as support for legal realism.