Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Legal Judgment Prediction via Multi-Perspective Bi-Feedback Network

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1905.03969 v2 pith:SBH6ZRFW submitted 2019-05-10 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords predictionsubtasksdescriptionsmultipleresultscasesdependenciesjudgment
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The Legal Judgment Prediction (LJP) is to determine judgment results based on the fact descriptions of the cases. LJP usually consists of multiple subtasks, such as applicable law articles prediction, charges prediction, and the term of the penalty prediction. These multiple subtasks have topological dependencies, the results of which affect and verify each other. However, existing methods use dependencies of results among multiple subtasks inefficiently. Moreover, for cases with similar descriptions but different penalties, current methods cannot predict accurately because the word collocation information is ignored. In this paper, we propose a Multi-Perspective Bi-Feedback Network with the Word Collocation Attention mechanism based on the topology structure among subtasks. Specifically, we design a multi-perspective forward prediction and backward verification framework to utilize result dependencies among multiple subtasks effectively. To distinguish cases with similar descriptions but different penalties, we integrate word collocations features of fact descriptions into the network via an attention mechanism. The experimental results show our model achieves significant improvements over baselines on all prediction tasks.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. The Judge Variable: Challenging Judge-Agnostic Legal Judgment Prediction

    cs.CL 2025-07 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    Models trained on individual judges' past child-custody rulings predict those judges' future rulings better than a model trained on all judges together, a result the paper reads as support for legal realism.

Pith tools