A large-scale study of real-world repositories finds that AI-generated code differs from human-written code in complexity, structural traits, defect indicators, and commit-level activity patterns.
Title resolution pending
2 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
2
Pith papers citing it
fields
cs.SE 2years
2026 2verdicts
UNVERDICTED 2representative citing papers
Empirical study finds coding agents produce fewer and less intense tangled refactorings than humans on Multi-SWE-bench; a refactoring-aware refinement improves compilability from 19.34% to 38.33% and resolves 2.79% more issues.
citing papers explorer
-
A Large-Scale Empirical Study of AI-Generated Code in Real-World Repositories
A large-scale study of real-world repositories finds that AI-generated code differs from human-written code in complexity, structural traits, defect indicators, and commit-level activity patterns.
-
"Refactoring Runaway": Understanding and Mitigating Tangled Refactorings in Coding Agents for Issue Resolution
Empirical study finds coding agents produce fewer and less intense tangled refactorings than humans on Multi-SWE-bench; a refactoring-aware refinement improves compilability from 19.34% to 38.33% and resolves 2.79% more issues.