A systematic review of 80 papers on model multiplicity, with a new taxonomy of developer choices and a formal distinction between multiplicity, uncertainty, and variance.
Practical Attribution Guidance for Rashomon Sets
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
Different prediction models might perform equally well (Rashomon set) in the same task, but offer conflicting interpretations and conclusions about the data. The Rashomon effect in the context of Explainable AI (XAI) has been recognized as a critical factor. Although the Rashomon set has been introduced and studied in various contexts, its practical application is at its infancy stage and lacks adequate guidance and evaluation. We study the problem of the Rashomon set sampling from a practical viewpoint and identify two fundamental axioms - generalizability and implementation sparsity that exploring methods ought to satisfy in practical usage. These two axioms are not satisfied by most known attribution methods, which we consider to be a fundamental weakness. We use the norms to guide the design of an $\epsilon$-subgradient-based sampling method. We apply this method to a fundamental mathematical problem as a proof of concept and to a set of practical datasets to demonstrate its ability compared with existing sampling methods.
fields
cs.LG 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Systemizing Multiplicity: The Curious Case of Arbitrariness in Machine Learning
A systematic review of 80 papers on model multiplicity, with a new taxonomy of developer choices and a formal distinction between multiplicity, uncertainty, and variance.