Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Systemizing Multiplicity: The Curious Case of Arbitrariness in Machine Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2501.14959 v2 pith:T45K4YVH submitted 2025-01-24 cs.LG cs.AI

classification cs.LGcs.AI
keywords arbitrarinessmultiplicityresearchtrendsacrossalgorithmicareaaround
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Algorithmic modeling relies on limited information in data to extrapolate outcomes for unseen scenarios, often embedding an element of arbitrariness in its decisions. A perspective on this arbitrariness that has recently gained interest is multiplicity-the study of arbitrariness across a set of "good models", i.e., those likely to be deployed in practice. In this work, we systemize the literature on multiplicity by: (a) formalizing the terminology around model design choices and their contribution to arbitrariness, (b) expanding the definition of multiplicity to incorporate underrepresented forms beyond just predictions and explanations, (c) clarifying the distinction between multiplicity and other lenses of arbitrariness, i.e., uncertainty and variance, and (d) distilling the benefits and potential risks of multiplicity into overarching trends, situating it within the broader landscape of responsible AI. We conclude by identifying open research questions and highlighting emerging trends in this young but rapidly growing area of research.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Exploring the Rashomon Set for Concept-Based Models

    cs.LG 2025-11 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A shared frozen backbone plus per-model LoRA adapters and a concept-diversity loss trains a set of accurate CBMs that reason through different concepts.

  2. Argumentative Ensembling for Robust Recourse under Model Multiplicity

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A bipolar-argumentation framework jointly selects models and counterfactuals so that returned counterfactuals are valid on all selected models, at the cost of majority voting.

  3. Semivalue-based data valuation is arbitrary and gameable

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Semivalue-based data valuations are shown to be highly sensitive to plausible utility-function choices and are gameable under the paper's weak definition of gameability.

Pith tools