The paper introduces the common causal covariates (CCC) assumption and a saturated 'DID-INT' estimator that is unbiased when covariate effects vary by group and time, but the heterogeneity claim is not proven.
Difference-in-Differences when Parallel Trends Holds Conditional on Covariates
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
We consider difference-in-differences identification and estimation strategies when the parallel trends assumption holds conditional on covariates, which can be time-varying, time-invariant, or both. We uncover several weaknesses of two-way fixed effects (TWFE) regressions in this context. The most important, which we call \textit{hidden linearity bias}, arises because transformations that eliminate unit fixed effects also transform the covariates, either implicitly changing the identification strategy or relying on correct model specification. We provide diagnostics for assessing a TWFE regression's susceptibility to hidden linearity bias and propose alternative estimation strategies that circumvent these issues.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
fields
econ.EM 1years
2024 1verdicts
REJECT 1roles
background 1polarities
unclear 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Good Controls Gone Bad: Difference-in-Differences with Covariates
The paper introduces the common causal covariates (CCC) assumption and a saturated 'DID-INT' estimator that is unbiased when covariate effects vary by group and time, but the heterogeneity claim is not proven.