On the Adult income dataset, fairness libraries Fairlearn, AIF360, and What-If Tool all reduce measured gender disparity in a credit-style classifier, but the paper's comparison across libraries is not controlled.
Toward Fairness in AI for People with Disabilities: A Research Roadmap
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
AI technologies have the potential to dramatically impact the lives of people with disabilities (PWD). Indeed, improving the lives of PWD is a motivator for many state-of-the-art AI systems, such as automated speech recognition tools that can caption videos for people who are deaf and hard of hearing, or language prediction algorithms that can augment communication for people with speech or cognitive disabilities. However, widely deployed AI systems may not work properly for PWD, or worse, may actively discriminate against them. These considerations regarding fairness in AI for PWD have thus far received little attention. In this position paper, we identify potential areas of concern regarding how several AI technology categories may impact particular disability constituencies if care is not taken in their design, development, and testing. We intend for this risk assessment of how various classes of AI might interact with various classes of disability to provide a roadmap for future research that is needed to gather data, test these hypotheses, and build more inclusive algorithms.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
fields
cs.LG 1years
2024 1verdicts
REJECT 1roles
background 1polarities
unclear 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Analyzing Fairness of Classification Machine Learning Model with Structured Dataset
On the Adult income dataset, fairness libraries Fairlearn, AIF360, and What-If Tool all reduce measured gender disparity in a credit-style classifier, but the paper's comparison across libraries is not controlled.