Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Toward Fairness in AI for People with Disabilities: A Research Roadmap

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1907.02227 v2 pith:IBUXZQRW submitted 2019-07-04 cs.CY cs.AIcs.HC

classification cs.CYcs.AIcs.HC
keywords peopledisabilitiesalgorithmsclassesdisabilityfairnessimpactlives
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

AI technologies have the potential to dramatically impact the lives of people with disabilities (PWD). Indeed, improving the lives of PWD is a motivator for many state-of-the-art AI systems, such as automated speech recognition tools that can caption videos for people who are deaf and hard of hearing, or language prediction algorithms that can augment communication for people with speech or cognitive disabilities. However, widely deployed AI systems may not work properly for PWD, or worse, may actively discriminate against them. These considerations regarding fairness in AI for PWD have thus far received little attention. In this position paper, we identify potential areas of concern regarding how several AI technology categories may impact particular disability constituencies if care is not taken in their design, development, and testing. We intend for this risk assessment of how various classes of AI might interact with various classes of disability to provide a roadmap for future research that is needed to gather data, test these hypotheses, and build more inclusive algorithms.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Analyzing Fairness of Computer Vision and Natural Language Processing Models

    cs.LG 2024-12 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

    Chaining fairness mitigation algorithms across ML lifecycle stages sometimes reduces bias more than single-stage application, but the evidence here is under-specified and partly circular.

  2. Analyzing Fairness of Classification Machine Learning Model with Structured Dataset

    cs.LG 2024-12 reject novelty 2.0 of 10

    On the Adult income dataset, fairness libraries Fairlearn, AIF360, and What-If Tool all reduce measured gender disparity in a credit-style classifier, but the paper's comparison across libraries is not controlled.

  3. AI and Accessibility: A Discussion of Ethical Considerations

    cs.CY 2019-08 unverdicted novelty 2.0 of 10

    A viewpoint article that outlines the ethical challenges of AI for people with disabilities and urges responsible development.

Pith tools