pith. sign in

More converged, less accurate? Reassessing standard choices for ab initio water using machine learning potentials

1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

1 Pith paper citing it
abstract

Accurately simulating the properties of liquid water remains a central challenge in molecular simulations. In this work, we use machine learning potentials to investigate how the convergence settings of electronic structure calculations impact the predicted structural and dynamical properties of simulated water and ice. We evaluate the true performance of several reference methods in classical and path-integral molecular dynamics. When we compare a popular, computationally pragmatic revPBE0-D3 setup against a highly converged one, our results reveal that its widely reported experimental agreement degrades. Applying the same highly converged settings to the $\mathrm{\omega}$B97X-rV functional, we find an improved agreement with experimental results. MP2 with a triple-$\zeta$ basis set commonly used for liquid water shows poor performance, which is indicative of insufficient convergence. These findings underscore the need for fully converged reference calculations when evaluating the fundamental accuracy of electronic structure methods and developing reliable models for aqueous systems.

years

2026 1

verdicts

UNVERDICTED 1

representative citing papers

How reproducible are first-principles simulations of liquid water?

physics.chem-ph · 2026-05-27 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

Prior revPBE-D3 DFT simulations of liquid water showed >20% variation in diffusion and 10% in density; new ML-potential-enabled benchmarks resolve these to consistent values across six codes, attributing prior errors to basis-set and sampling issues.

citing papers explorer

Showing 1 of 1 citing paper.

  • How reproducible are first-principles simulations of liquid water? physics.chem-ph · 2026-05-27 · unverdicted · none · ref 39 · internal anchor

    Prior revPBE-D3 DFT simulations of liquid water showed >20% variation in diffusion and 10% in density; new ML-potential-enabled benchmarks resolve these to consistent values across six codes, attributing prior errors to basis-set and sampling issues.