Pith. sign in

LIAR: Leveraging Inference Time Alignment (Best-of-N) to Jailbreak LLMs in Seconds

1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

1 Pith paper citing it
abstract

Jailbreak attacks expose vulnerabilities in safety-aligned LLMs by eliciting harmful outputs through carefully crafted prompts. Existing methods rely on discrete optimization or trained adversarial generators, but are slow, compute-intensive, and often impractical. We argue that these inefficiencies stem from a mischaracterization of the problem. Instead, we frame jailbreaks as inference-time misalignment and introduce LIAR (Leveraging Inference-time misAlignment to jailbReak), a fast, black-box, best-of-$N$ sampling attack requiring no training. LIAR matches state-of-the-art success rates while reducing perplexity by $10\times$ and Time-to-Attack from hours to seconds. We also introduce a theoretical "safety net against jailbreaks" metric to quantify safety alignment strength and derive suboptimality bounds. Our work offers a simple yet effective tool for evaluating LLM robustness and advancing alignment research.

citation-role summary

background 1

citation-polarity summary

fields

cs.CR 1

years

2025 1

verdicts

CONDITIONAL 1

roles

background 1

polarities

support 1

representative citing papers

citing papers explorer

Showing 1 of 1 citing paper.

  • Security Concerns for Large Language Models: A Survey cs.CR · 2025-05-24 · conditional · none · ref 7 · internal anchor

    A survey that classifies LLM security threats and argues that intrinsic agentic risks, such as scheming, are underappreciated and poorly defended.