A systematic empirical study shows concept probes need surprisingly little data for task-relevant concepts, tolerate data reuse and moderate label noise, and benefit slightly from larger probed models.
Concept-Based Explanations in Computer Vision: Where Are We and Where Could We Go?
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
Concept-based XAI (C-XAI) approaches to explaining neural vision models are a promising field of research, since explanations that refer to concepts (i.e., semantically meaningful parts in an image) are intuitive to understand and go beyond saliency-based techniques that only reveal relevant regions. Given the remarkable progress in this field in recent years, it is time for the community to take a critical look at the advances and trends. Consequently, this paper reviews C-XAI methods to identify interesting and underexplored areas and proposes future research directions. To this end, we consider three main directions: the choice of concepts to explain, the choice of concept representation, and how we can control concepts. For the latter, we propose techniques and draw inspiration from the field of knowledge representation and learning, showing how this could enrich future C-XAI research.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
fields
cs.AI 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1roles
background 1polarities
background 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
On the Performance of Concept Probing: The Influence of the Data (Extended Version)
A systematic empirical study shows concept probes need surprisingly little data for task-relevant concepts, tolerate data reuse and moderate label noise, and benefit slightly from larger probed models.