Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Concept-Based Explanations in Computer Vision: Where Are We and Where Could We Go?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2409.13456 v1 pith:UU2GUT63 submitted 2024-09-20 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords c-xaiconceptsfieldresearchchoiceconcept-baseddirectionsexplanations
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Concept-based XAI (C-XAI) approaches to explaining neural vision models are a promising field of research, since explanations that refer to concepts (i.e., semantically meaningful parts in an image) are intuitive to understand and go beyond saliency-based techniques that only reveal relevant regions. Given the remarkable progress in this field in recent years, it is time for the community to take a critical look at the advances and trends. Consequently, this paper reviews C-XAI methods to identify interesting and underexplored areas and proposes future research directions. To this end, we consider three main directions: the choice of concepts to explain, the choice of concept representation, and how we can control concepts. For the latter, we propose techniques and draw inspiration from the field of knowledge representation and learning, showing how this could enrich future C-XAI research.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. On the Performance of Concept Probing: The Influence of the Data (Extended Version)

    cs.AI 2025-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A systematic empirical study shows concept probes need surprisingly little data for task-relevant concepts, tolerate data reuse and moderate label noise, and benefit slightly from larger probed models.

Pith tools