A perturbation-based metric using FGSM flips of ±1/255 instead of zero-masking gives more consistent and monotonic evaluation of attribution maps across 15 CNN-dataset pairs, with SmoothGrad ranked first.
A Review of Adversarial Attack and Defense for Classification Methods
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
Despite the efficiency and scalability of machine learning systems, recent studies have demonstrated that many classification methods, especially deep neural networks (DNNs), are vulnerable to adversarial examples; i.e., examples that are carefully crafted to fool a well-trained classification model while being indistinguishable from natural data to human. This makes it potentially unsafe to apply DNNs or related methods in security-critical areas. Since this issue was first identified by Biggio et al. (2013) and Szegedy et al.(2014), much work has been done in this field, including the development of attack methods to generate adversarial examples and the construction of defense techniques to guard against such examples. This paper aims to introduce this topic and its latest developments to the statistical community, primarily focusing on the generation and guarding of adversarial examples. Computing codes (in python and R) used in the numerical experiments are publicly available for readers to explore the surveyed methods. It is the hope of the authors that this paper will encourage more statisticians to work on this important and exciting field of generating and defending against adversarial examples.
fields
cs.CV 1years
2024 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Reliable Evaluation of Attribution Maps in CNNs: A Perturbation-Based Approach
A perturbation-based metric using FGSM flips of ±1/255 instead of zero-masking gives more consistent and monotonic evaluation of attribution maps across 15 CNN-dataset pairs, with SmoothGrad ranked first.