Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

A Review of Adversarial Attack and Defense for Classification Methods

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2111.09961 v1 pith:7JJWT4TN submitted 2021-11-18 cs.CR cs.LG

classification cs.CRcs.LG
keywords examplesadversarialmethodsclassificationattackdefensednnsfield
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Despite the efficiency and scalability of machine learning systems, recent studies have demonstrated that many classification methods, especially deep neural networks (DNNs), are vulnerable to adversarial examples; i.e., examples that are carefully crafted to fool a well-trained classification model while being indistinguishable from natural data to human. This makes it potentially unsafe to apply DNNs or related methods in security-critical areas. Since this issue was first identified by Biggio et al. (2013) and Szegedy et al.(2014), much work has been done in this field, including the development of attack methods to generate adversarial examples and the construction of defense techniques to guard against such examples. This paper aims to introduce this topic and its latest developments to the statistical community, primarily focusing on the generation and guarding of adversarial examples. Computing codes (in python and R) used in the numerical experiments are publicly available for readers to explore the surveyed methods. It is the hope of the authors that this paper will encourage more statisticians to work on this important and exciting field of generating and defending against adversarial examples.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Reliable Evaluation of Attribution Maps in CNNs: A Perturbation-Based Approach

    cs.CV 2024-11 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A perturbation-based metric using FGSM flips of ±1/255 instead of zero-masking gives more consistent and monotonic evaluation of attribution maps across 15 CNN-dataset pairs, with SmoothGrad ranked first.

Pith tools