pith. sign in

Proactive agent research environment: Simulating active users to evaluate proactive assistants

3 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

3 Pith papers citing it

years

2026 3

representative citing papers

ProactBench: Beyond What The User Asked For

cs.LG · 2026-05-09 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

ProactBench measures LLM conversational proactivity in three phases using 198 multi-agent dialogues and finds recovery behavior hard to predict from existing benchmarks.

Agentic Coding Needs Proactivity, Not Just Autonomy

cs.SE · 2026-05-07 · conditional · novelty 6.0

Coding agents require a three-level proactivity taxonomy (Reactive, Scheduled, Situation Aware) evaluated by insight policy quality using Insight Decision Quality, Context Grounding Score, and Learning Lift.

citing papers explorer

Showing 3 of 3 citing papers.

  • $\pi$-Bench: Evaluating Proactive Personal Assistant Agents in Long-Horizon Workflows cs.AI · 2026-05-14 · unverdicted · none · ref 27 · 2 links

    π-Bench is a new benchmark for evaluating proactive personal assistant agents on 100 multi-turn tasks that include hidden intents, inter-task dependencies, and cross-session continuity.

  • ProactBench: Beyond What The User Asked For cs.LG · 2026-05-09 · unverdicted · none · ref 131

    ProactBench measures LLM conversational proactivity in three phases using 198 multi-agent dialogues and finds recovery behavior hard to predict from existing benchmarks.

  • Agentic Coding Needs Proactivity, Not Just Autonomy cs.SE · 2026-05-07 · conditional · none · ref 20

    Coding agents require a three-level proactivity taxonomy (Reactive, Scheduled, Situation Aware) evaluated by insight policy quality using Insight Decision Quality, Context Grounding Score, and Learning Lift.