BioDefect is a new dataset for defect detection in bioinformatics software that improves average F1-scores by 29.61% to 38.04% over existing datasets when evaluated on nine language models.
Title resolution pending
4 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
4
Pith papers citing it
citation-role summary
background 1
citation-polarity summary
fields
cs.SE 4roles
background 1polarities
background 1representative citing papers
BootstrapAgent distills repository bootstrapping heuristics into a persistent .bootstrap contract via multi-agent evidence extraction, Docker verification, and trace-driven repair, reporting 92.9% success and efficiency gains on three benchmarks.
ML4AVD research remains locked into binary function-level classification of C/C++ vulnerabilities because twelve pain points in the pipeline reinforce each other through feedback loops.
LLMs achieve strong results on syntax parsing tasks but show limited and variable performance on dynamic reasoning, with a clear performance hierarchy across model scales.
citing papers explorer
-
BioDefect: The First Dataset for Defect Detection in Bioinformatics Software
BioDefect is a new dataset for defect detection in bioinformatics software that improves average F1-scores by 29.61% to 38.04% over existing datasets when evaluated on nine language models.
-
BootstrapAgent: Distilling Repository Setup into Reusable Agent Knowledge
BootstrapAgent distills repository bootstrapping heuristics into a persistent .bootstrap contract via multi-agent evidence extraction, Docker verification, and trace-driven repair, reporting 92.9% success and efficiency gains on three benchmarks.
-
Direction for Detection: A Survey of Automated Vulnerability Detection and all of its Pain Points
ML4AVD research remains locked into binary function-level classification of C/C++ vulnerabilities because twelve pain points in the pipeline reinforce each other through feedback loops.
-
Exploring Code Analysis: Zero-Shot Insights on Syntax and Semantics with LLMs
LLMs achieve strong results on syntax parsing tasks but show limited and variable performance on dynamic reasoning, with a clear performance hierarchy across model scales.