Forecasts LGWA reach and measurement precision for IMBH binaries, with the caveat that an updated lunar-response sensitivity curve shrinks the detection horizon from redshift ~10 to ~1.
Towards a Consistent Calculation of the Lunar Response to Gravitational Waves
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
The recent increasing interest in detecting gravitational waves (GWs) by lunar seismic measurement urges us to have a clear understanding of the response of the moon to passing GWs. In this paper, we clarify the relationship between two seemly different response functions which have been derived previously using two different methods, one taking the field-theory approach and the other using the tidal force induced by GWs. We revisit their derivation and prove, by both analytical arguments and numerical calculations, that the two response functions are equivalent. Their apparent difference can be attributed to the choice of different coordinates. Using the correct response function, we calculate the sensitivities (to GWs) of several designed lunar seismometers, and find that the sensitivity curves between $10^{-3}$ and $0.1$ Hz are much flatter than the previous calculations based on normal-mode model. Our results will help clarifying the scientific objectives of lunar GW observation, as well as provide important constraints on the design of lunar GW detectors.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
fields
astro-ph.HE 1years
2025 1verdicts
REJECT 1roles
background 1polarities
unclear 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Probing intermediate-mass black hole binaries with the Lunar Gravitational-wave Antenna
Forecasts LGWA reach and measurement precision for IMBH binaries, with the caveat that an updated lunar-response sensitivity curve shrinks the detection horizon from redshift ~10 to ~1.