Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Towards a Consistent Calculation of the Lunar Response to Gravitational Waves

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2403.08681 v1 pith:RZEH5W6T submitted 2024-03-13 gr-qc astro-ph.HE

classification gr-qcastro-ph.HE
keywords lunarresponsedifferentcalculationsfunctionsgravitationalwavesanalytical
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

The recent increasing interest in detecting gravitational waves (GWs) by lunar seismic measurement urges us to have a clear understanding of the response of the moon to passing GWs. In this paper, we clarify the relationship between two seemly different response functions which have been derived previously using two different methods, one taking the field-theory approach and the other using the tidal force induced by GWs. We revisit their derivation and prove, by both analytical arguments and numerical calculations, that the two response functions are equivalent. Their apparent difference can be attributed to the choice of different coordinates. Using the correct response function, we calculate the sensitivities (to GWs) of several designed lunar seismometers, and find that the sensitivity curves between $10^{-3}$ and $0.1$ Hz are much flatter than the previous calculations based on normal-mode model. Our results will help clarifying the scientific objectives of lunar GW observation, as well as provide important constraints on the design of lunar GW detectors.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Probing intermediate-mass black hole binaries with the Lunar Gravitational-wave Antenna

    astro-ph.HE 2025-02 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    Forecasts LGWA reach and measurement precision for IMBH binaries, with the caveat that an updated lunar-response sensitivity curve shrinks the detection horizon from redshift ~10 to ~1.

Pith tools