Morphological alignment of tokenizers across 70 languages explains only about 0.5% to 6% of variance in language model task performance, with a small negative trend.
Splintering Nonconcatenative Languages for Better Tokenization
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
Common subword tokenization algorithms like BPE and UnigramLM assume that text can be split into meaningful units by concatenative measures alone. This is not true for languages such as Hebrew and Arabic, where morphology is encoded in root-template patterns, or Malay and Georgian, where split affixes are common. We present SPLINTER, a pre-processing step which rearranges text into a linear form that better represents such nonconcatenative morphologies, enabling meaningful contiguous segments to be found by the tokenizer. We demonstrate SPLINTER's merit using both intrinsic measures evaluating token vocabularies in Hebrew, Arabic, and Malay; as well as on downstream tasks using BERT-architecture models trained for Hebrew.
fields
cs.CL 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Evaluating Morphological Alignment of Tokenizers in 70 Languages
Morphological alignment of tokenizers across 70 languages explains only about 0.5% to 6% of variance in language model task performance, with a small negative trend.