REVIEW 2 cited by
Splintering Nonconcatenative Languages for Better Tokenization
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Common subword tokenization algorithms like BPE and UnigramLM assume that text can be split into meaningful units by concatenative measures alone. This is not true for languages such as Hebrew and Arabic, where morphology is encoded in root-template patterns, or Malay and Georgian, where split affixes are common. We present SPLINTER, a pre-processing step which rearranges text into a linear form that better represents such nonconcatenative morphologies, enabling meaningful contiguous segments to be found by the tokenizer. We demonstrate SPLINTER's merit using both intrinsic measures evaluating token vocabularies in Hebrew, Arabic, and Malay; as well as on downstream tasks using BERT-architecture models trained for Hebrew.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
ByteSpan: Information-Driven Subword Tokenisation
A tokeniser that groups predictable bytes using a byte-level LM's surprisal or entropy achieves higher morphological alignment than BPE without loss of compression.
-
Evaluating Morphological Alignment of Tokenizers in 70 Languages
Morphological alignment of tokenizers across 70 languages explains only about 0.5% to 6% of variance in language model task performance, with a small negative trend.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.