A between-subjects experiment (N=192) finds that token-level uncertainty increases agreement with LLM answers while relation-level uncertainty reduces external verification in medical decision tasks.
arXiv preprint (2024), https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.17287, arXiv:2404.17287
3 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
3
Pith papers citing it
citation-role summary
background 1
citation-polarity summary
years
2026 3verdicts
UNVERDICTED 3roles
background 1polarities
background 1representative citing papers
CAPO improves LLM calibration by up to 15% while matching or exceeding GRPO accuracy through logistic AUC loss and noise masking, enabling better abstention and scaling performance.
A multi-strategy interrogation method with auxiliary expert assessment reduces expected calibration error by 40% on average across three medical VQA datasets for MLLMs.
citing papers explorer
-
Not All Uncertainty Is Equal: How Uncertainty Granularity Shapes Human Verification in LLM-Assisted Decision Making
A between-subjects experiment (N=192) finds that token-level uncertainty increases agreement with LLM answers while relation-level uncertainty reduces external verification in medical decision tasks.
-
Calibration-Aware Policy Optimization for Reasoning LLMs
CAPO improves LLM calibration by up to 15% while matching or exceeding GRPO accuracy through logistic AUC loss and noise masking, enabling better abstention and scaling performance.
-
Confidence Calibration for Multimodal LLMs: An Empirical Study through Medical VQA
A multi-strategy interrogation method with auxiliary expert assessment reduces expected calibration error by 40% on average across three medical VQA datasets for MLLMs.