Pith. sign in

Adaptive Test-Time Compute Allocation with Evolving In-Context Demonstrations

1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

1 Pith paper citing it
abstract

While scaling test-time compute can substantially improve model performance, existing approaches either rely on static compute allocation or sample from fixed generation distributions. In this work, we introduce a test-time compute allocation framework that jointly adapts where computation is spent and how generation is performed. Our method begins with a warm-up phase that identifies easy queries and assembles an initial pool of question-response pairs from the test set itself. An adaptive phase then concentrates further computation on unresolved queries while reshaping their generation distributions through evolving in-context demonstrations -- conditioning each generation on successful responses from semantically related queries rather than resampling from a fixed distribution. Experiments across math, coding, and reasoning benchmarks demonstrate that our approach consistently outperforms existing baselines while consuming substantially less inference-time compute.

fields

cs.AI 1

years

2026 1

verdicts

UNVERDICTED 1

representative citing papers

Active Testing of Large Language Models via Approximate Neyman Allocation

cs.AI · 2026-05-11 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0 · 2 refs

Proposes surrogate semantic entropy stratification followed by approximate Neyman allocation for active testing of LLMs on generative benchmarks, reporting up to 28% MSE reduction and 22.9% average budget savings versus uniform sampling.

citing papers explorer

Showing 1 of 1 citing paper.

  • Active Testing of Large Language Models via Approximate Neyman Allocation cs.AI · 2026-05-11 · unverdicted · none · ref 21 · 2 links · internal anchor

    Proposes surrogate semantic entropy stratification followed by approximate Neyman allocation for active testing of LLMs on generative benchmarks, reporting up to 28% MSE reduction and 22.9% average budget savings versus uniform sampling.