PRAIB reveals LLM reviews are less variable, positively biased, overconfident, longer, and overlook atomic weaknesses noted by humans compared to real reviewer feedback.
What drives pa- per acceptance? a process-centric analysis of modern peer review
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
1
Pith paper citing it
fields
cs.AI 1years
2026 1verdicts
UNVERDICTED 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
PRAIB: Peer Review AI Benchmark of Behaviour of LLM-Assisted Reviewing
PRAIB reveals LLM reviews are less variable, positively biased, overconfident, longer, and overlook atomic weaknesses noted by humans compared to real reviewer feedback.