The authors define trust-relevant stochasticity as variability at or above a user's valued level of description, and propose latent value modeling to assess user-system value alignment.
Does human-robot trust need reciprocity?
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
1
Pith paper citing it
abstract
Trust is one of the hallmarks of human-human and human-robot interaction. Extensive evidence has shown that trust among humans requires reciprocity. Conversely, research in human-robot interaction (HRI) has mostly relied on a unidirectional view of trust that focuses on robots' reliability and performance. The current paper argues that reciprocity may also play a key role in the emergence of mutual trust and successful collaboration between humans and robots. We will gather and discuss works that reveal a reciprocal dimension in human-robot trust, paving the way to a bidirectional and dynamic view of trust in HRI.
citation-role summary
background 1
citation-polarity summary
fields
cs.CY 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1roles
background 1polarities
unclear 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Trustworthiness in Stochastic Systems: Towards Opening the Black Box
The authors define trust-relevant stochasticity as variability at or above a user's valued level of description, and propose latent value modeling to assess user-system value alignment.