TRACE compiles user corrections into runtime enforcement rules for coding agents, cutting preference violations from 100% to 37.6% in-distribution and 2% out-of-distribution on ClawArena tasks while matching memory baselines on task success.
PolicyLLM: Towards Excellent Comprehension of Public Policy for Large Language Models
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly integrated into real-world decision-making, including in the domain of public policy. Yet, their ability to comprehend and reason about policy-related content remains underexplored. To fill this gap, we present \textbf{\textit{PolicyBench}}, the first large-scale cross-system benchmark (US-China) evaluating policy comprehension, comprising 21K cases across a broad spectrum of policy areas, capturing the diversity and complexity of real-world governance. Following Bloom's taxonomy, the benchmark assesses three core capabilities: (1) \textbf{Memorization}: factual recall of policy knowledge, (2) \textbf{Understanding}: conceptual and contextual reasoning, and (3) \textbf{Application}: problem-solving in real-life policy scenarios. Building on this benchmark, we further propose \textbf{\textit{PolicyMoE}}, a domain-specialized Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) model with expert modules aligned to each cognitive level. The proposed models demonstrate stronger performance on application-oriented policy tasks than on memorization or conceptual understanding, and yields the highest accuracy on structured reasoning tasks. Our results reveal key limitations of current LLMs in policy understanding and suggest paths toward more reliable, policy-focused models.
fields
cs.LG 1years
2026 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Getting Better at Working With You: Compiling User Corrections into Runtime Enforcement for Coding Agents
TRACE compiles user corrections into runtime enforcement rules for coding agents, cutting preference violations from 100% to 37.6% in-distribution and 2% out-of-distribution on ClawArena tasks while matching memory baselines on task success.