Pith. sign in

Knowledge Graph Reasoning with Logics and Embeddings: Survey and Perspective

1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

1 Pith paper citing it
abstract

Knowledge graph (KG) reasoning is becoming increasingly popular in both academia and industry. Conventional KG reasoning based on symbolic logic is deterministic, with reasoning results being explainable, while modern embedding-based reasoning can deal with uncertainty and predict plausible knowledge, often with high efficiency via vector computation. A promising direction is to integrate both logic-based and embedding-based methods, with the vision to have advantages of both. It has attracted wide research attention with more and more works published in recent years. In this paper, we comprehensively survey these works, focusing on how logics and embeddings are integrated. We first briefly introduce preliminaries, then systematically categorize and discuss works of logic and embedding-aware KG reasoning from different perspectives, and finally conclude and discuss the challenges and further directions.

citation-role summary

background 1

citation-polarity summary

fields

cs.AI 1

years

2025 1

verdicts

CONDITIONAL 1

roles

background 1

polarities

background 1

representative citing papers

Towards Unified Neurosymbolic Reasoning on Knowledge Graphs

cs.AI · 2025-07-04 · conditional · novelty 6.0

TUNSR unifies propositional and first-order logic reasoning in one model for knowledge graph link prediction and reports state-of-the-art results on 19 datasets across four reasoning scenarios.

citing papers explorer

Showing 1 of 1 citing paper.

  • Towards Unified Neurosymbolic Reasoning on Knowledge Graphs cs.AI · 2025-07-04 · conditional · none · ref 47 · internal anchor

    TUNSR unifies propositional and first-order logic reasoning in one model for knowledge graph link prediction and reports state-of-the-art results on 19 datasets across four reasoning scenarios.