Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Knowledge Graph Reasoning with Logics and Embeddings: Survey and Perspective

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2202.07412 v1 pith:3AIX73TB submitted 2022-02-15 cs.AI

classification cs.AI
keywords reasoningknowledgeworksdiscussembedding-basedembeddingsgraphlogic
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Knowledge graph (KG) reasoning is becoming increasingly popular in both academia and industry. Conventional KG reasoning based on symbolic logic is deterministic, with reasoning results being explainable, while modern embedding-based reasoning can deal with uncertainty and predict plausible knowledge, often with high efficiency via vector computation. A promising direction is to integrate both logic-based and embedding-based methods, with the vision to have advantages of both. It has attracted wide research attention with more and more works published in recent years. In this paper, we comprehensively survey these works, focusing on how logics and embeddings are integrated. We first briefly introduce preliminaries, then systematically categorize and discuss works of logic and embedding-aware KG reasoning from different perspectives, and finally conclude and discuss the challenges and further directions.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Towards Unified Neurosymbolic Reasoning on Knowledge Graphs

    cs.AI 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    TUNSR unifies propositional and first-order logic reasoning in one model for knowledge graph link prediction and reports state-of-the-art results on 19 datasets across four reasoning scenarios.

Pith tools