This document claims plant-algorithm co-creation grows in metaverse bio-art, but its body text is a different statistics paper, leaving the claims unsupported.
It Is Likely That Your Loss Should be a Likelihood
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
Many common loss functions such as mean-squared-error, cross-entropy, and reconstruction loss are unnecessarily rigid. Under a probabilistic interpretation, these common losses correspond to distributions with fixed shapes and scales. We instead argue for optimizing full likelihoods that include parameters like the normal variance and softmax temperature. Joint optimization of these "likelihood parameters" with model parameters can adaptively tune the scales and shapes of losses in addition to the strength of regularization. We explore and systematically evaluate how to parameterize and apply likelihood parameters for robust modeling, outlier-detection, and re-calibration. Additionally, we propose adaptively tuning $L_2$ and $L_1$ weights by fitting the scale parameters of normal and Laplace priors and introduce more flexible element-wise regularizers.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
fields
cs.HC 1years
2025 1verdicts
REJECT 1roles
background 1polarities
background 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Plant-Centric Metaverse: A Biocentric-Creation Framework for Ecological Art and Digital Symbiosis
This document claims plant-algorithm co-creation grows in metaverse bio-art, but its body text is a different statistics paper, leaving the claims unsupported.