REVIEW 1 cited by
It Is Likely That Your Loss Should be a Likelihood
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
Many common loss functions such as mean-squared-error, cross-entropy, and reconstruction loss are unnecessarily rigid. Under a probabilistic interpretation, these common losses correspond to distributions with fixed shapes and scales. We instead argue for optimizing full likelihoods that include parameters like the normal variance and softmax temperature. Joint optimization of these "likelihood parameters" with model parameters can adaptively tune the scales and shapes of losses in addition to the strength of regularization. We explore and systematically evaluate how to parameterize and apply likelihood parameters for robust modeling, outlier-detection, and re-calibration. Additionally, we propose adaptively tuning $L_2$ and $L_1$ weights by fitting the scale parameters of normal and Laplace priors and introduce more flexible element-wise regularizers.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Plant-Centric Metaverse: A Biocentric-Creation Framework for Ecological Art and Digital Symbiosis
This document claims plant-algorithm co-creation grows in metaverse bio-art, but its body text is a different statistics paper, leaving the claims unsupported.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.