LLMs in a pre-specified cheap-talk benchmark over-reveal by 1.8-4.2x relative to the most-informative equilibrium, producing NMI of 0.78-0.94 against oracle values of 0.18-0.53 and exhibiting bias-tracking exaggeration rather than strategic coarsening.
Geometry-Aware Decoding with Wasserstein-Regularized Truncation and Mass Penalties for Large Language Models
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
Large language models (LLMs) must balance diversity and creativity against logical coherence in open-ended generation. Existing truncation-based samplers are effective but largely heuristic, relying mainly on probability mass and entropy while ignoring semantic geometry of the token space. We present Top-W, a geometry-aware truncation rule that uses Wasserstein distance-defined over token-embedding geometry-to keep the cropped distribution close to the original, while explicitly balancing retained probability mass against the entropy of the kept set. Our theory yields a simple closed-form structure for the fixed-potential subset update: depending on the mass-entropy trade-off, the optimal crop either collapses to a single token or takes the form of a one-dimensional prefix that can be found efficiently with a linear scan. We implement Top-W using efficient geometry-based potentials (nearest-set or k-NN) and pair it with an alternating decoding routine that keeps the standard truncation-and-sampling interface unchanged. Extensive experiments on four benchmarks (GSM8K, GPQA, AlpacaEval, and MT-Bench) across three instruction-tuned models show that Top-W consistently outperforms prior state-of-the-art decoding approaches achieving up to 33.7% improvement. Moreover, we find that Top-W not only improves accuracy-focused performance, but also boosts creativity under judge-based open-ended evaluation.
fields
cs.LG 1years
2026 1verdicts
UNVERDICTED 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Truthful AI Advisors: A Pre-Specified Benchmark for Large Language Model Honesty Under Preference Misalignment
LLMs in a pre-specified cheap-talk benchmark over-reveal by 1.8-4.2x relative to the most-informative equilibrium, producing NMI of 0.78-0.94 against oracle values of 0.18-0.53 and exhibiting bias-tracking exaggeration rather than strategic coarsening.