pith. sign in

Shifting the Quantum-Classical Boundary: Theory and Experiment for Statistically Classical Optical Fields

1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

1 Pith paper citing it
abstract

The growing recognition that entanglement is not exclusively a quantum property, and does not even originate with Schr\"odinger's famous remark about it [Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 31, 555 (1935)], prompts examination of its role in marking the quantum-classical boundary. We have done this by subjecting correlations of classical optical fields to new Bell-analysis experiments, and report here values of the Bell parameter greater than ${\cal B} = 2.54$. This is many standard deviations outside the limit ${\cal B} = 2$ established by the Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt (CHSH) Bell inequality [Phys. Rev. Lett. 23, 880 (1969)], in agreement with our theoretical classical prediction, and not far from the Tsirelson limit ${\cal B} = 2.828...$. These results cast a new light on the standard quantum-classical boundary description, and suggest a reinterpretation of it.

fields

quant-ph 1

years

2026 1

verdicts

UNVERDICTED 1

clear filters

representative citing papers

Bell's theorem: why probability factorisation fails

quant-ph · 2026-05-28 · unverdicted · novelty 3.0

Bell-type correlations are reinterpreted as sequential single-spin auto-correlations under counterfactual equivalence, explaining non-locality via state-altering measurements on undefined quantities.

citing papers explorer

Showing 1 of 1 citing paper after filters.

  • Bell's theorem: why probability factorisation fails quant-ph · 2026-05-28 · unverdicted · none · ref 29 · internal anchor

    Bell-type correlations are reinterpreted as sequential single-spin auto-correlations under counterfactual equivalence, explaining non-locality via state-altering measurements on undefined quantities.