Pith. sign in

Prompting LLMs: Length Control for Isometric Machine Translation

1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

1 Pith paper citing it
abstract

In this study, we explore the effectiveness of isometric machine translation across multiple language pairs (En$\to$De, En$\to$Fr, and En$\to$Es) under the conditions of the IWSLT Isometric Shared Task 2022. Using eight open-source large language models (LLMs) of varying sizes, we investigate how different prompting strategies, varying numbers of few-shot examples, and demonstration selection influence translation quality and length control. We discover that the phrasing of instructions, when aligned with the properties of the provided demonstrations, plays a crucial role in controlling the output length. Our experiments show that LLMs tend to produce shorter translations only when presented with extreme examples, while isometric demonstrations often lead to the models disregarding length constraints. While few-shot prompting generally enhances translation quality, further improvements are marginal across 5, 10, and 20-shot settings. Finally, considering multiple outputs allows to notably improve overall tradeoff between the length and quality, yielding state-of-the-art performance for some language pairs.

fields

cs.CL 1

years

2025 1

verdicts

CONDITIONAL 1

representative citing papers

Prompt-Based One-Shot Exact Length-Controlled Generation with LLMs

cs.CL · 2025-08-19 · conditional · novelty 5.0

Appending visible descending countdown markers to the prompt makes off-the-shelf LLMs hit exact word or character targets far more often, with exact-match rates reaching 30 to 96 percent across four benchmarks, eleven models, and two languages.

citing papers explorer

Showing 1 of 1 citing paper.

  • Prompt-Based One-Shot Exact Length-Controlled Generation with LLMs cs.CL · 2025-08-19 · conditional · none · ref 13 · internal anchor

    Appending visible descending countdown markers to the prompt makes off-the-shelf LLMs hit exact word or character targets far more often, with exact-match rates reaching 30 to 96 percent across four benchmarks, eleven models, and two languages.