pith. sign in

hub Mixed citations

ToRA: A Tool-Integrated Reasoning Agent for Mathematical Problem Solving

Mixed citation behavior. Most common role is background (67%).

22 Pith papers citing it
Background 67% of classified citations
abstract

Large language models have made significant progress in various language tasks, yet they still struggle with complex mathematics. In this paper, we propose ToRA a series of Tool-integrated Reasoning Agents designed to solve challenging mathematical problems by seamlessly integrating natural language reasoning with the utilization of external tools (e.g., computation libraries and symbolic solvers), thereby amalgamating the analytical prowess of language and the computational efficiency of tools. To train ToRA, we curate interactive tool-use trajectories on mathematical datasets, apply imitation learning on the annotations, and propose output space shaping to further refine models' reasoning behavior. As a result, ToRA models significantly outperform open-source models on 10 mathematical reasoning datasets across all scales with 13%-19% absolute improvements on average. Notably, ToRA-7B reaches 44.6% on the competition-level dataset MATH, surpassing the best open-source model WizardMath-70B by 22% absolute. ToRA-Code-34B is also the first open-source model that achieves an accuracy exceeding 50% on MATH, which significantly outperforms GPT-4's CoT result, and is competitive with GPT-4 solving problems with programs. Additionally, we conduct a comprehensive analysis of the benefits and remaining challenges of tool interaction for mathematical reasoning, providing valuable insights for future research.

hub tools

citation-role summary

background 4 baseline 1 method 1

citation-polarity summary

representative citing papers

Unified Data Selection for LLM Reasoning

cs.CL · 2026-05-21 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

High-Entropy Sum (HES) selects high-quality reasoning data for LLMs by summing entropy of the top highest-entropy tokens, matching full-dataset performance with top 20% in SFT and outperforming baselines in RFT and RL.

ToolRL: Reward is All Tool Learning Needs

cs.LG · 2025-04-16 · conditional · novelty 6.0

A principled reward design for tool selection and application in RL-trained LLMs delivers 17% gains over base models and 15% over SFT across benchmarks.

citing papers explorer

Showing 22 of 22 citing papers.