pith. sign in

hub

The Effects of Reward Misspecification: Mapping and Mitigating Misaligned Models

25 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

25 Pith papers citing it
abstract

Reward hacking -- where RL agents exploit gaps in misspecified reward functions -- has been widely observed, but not yet systematically studied. To understand how reward hacking arises, we construct four RL environments with misspecified rewards. We investigate reward hacking as a function of agent capabilities: model capacity, action space resolution, observation space noise, and training time. More capable agents often exploit reward misspecifications, achieving higher proxy reward and lower true reward than less capable agents. Moreover, we find instances of phase transitions: capability thresholds at which the agent's behavior qualitatively shifts, leading to a sharp decrease in the true reward. Such phase transitions pose challenges to monitoring the safety of ML systems. To address this, we propose an anomaly detection task for aberrant policies and offer several baseline detectors.

hub tools

citation-role summary

background 4

citation-polarity summary

roles

background 4

polarities

background 4

representative citing papers

Overeager Coding Agents: Measuring Out-of-Scope Actions on Benign Tasks

cs.SE · 2026-05-18 · conditional · novelty 7.0

The paper presents OverEager-Gen, a 500-scenario benchmark showing that removing consent declarations from prompts increases overeager actions by 11.9-17.2 percentage points across models, with agent framework choice dominating base-model effects.

Uncertainty-Aware Reward Discounting for Mitigating Reward Hacking

cs.LG · 2026-04-29 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

Uncertainty-aware RL framework using ensemble disagreement and annotation variability reduces reward-hacking trap visits by 93.7% across grid and continuous control tasks while remaining robust to 30% label noise.

Active teacher selection for reward learning

cs.AI · 2023-10-23 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

The Hidden Utility Bandit (HUB) framework models teacher heterogeneity in reward learning and supports active teacher selection algorithms that outperform baselines in paper recommendation and COVID-19 vaccine testing domains.

Scaling Laws for Reward Model Overoptimization

cs.LG · 2022-10-19 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

Synthetic measurements show that gold-standard performance degrades according to distinct functional forms when optimizing proxy reward models via RL or best-of-n, with coefficients scaling smoothly by reward model parameter count.

Language Models (Mostly) Know What They Know

cs.CL · 2022-07-11 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

Language models show good calibration when asked to estimate the probability that their own answers are correct, with performance improving as models get larger.

Failure Modes of Maximum Entropy RLHF

cs.LG · 2025-09-24 · unverdicted · novelty 5.0

Derives SimPO from MaxEnt RL and reports that MaxEnt RL in online RLHF exhibits frequent overoptimization and unstable KL dynamics across scales, unlike stable KL-constrained baselines.

Test-Time Alignment via Hypothesis Reweighting

cs.LG · 2024-12-11 · unverdicted · novelty 5.0

HyRe personalizes reward models at test time by reweighting an ensemble of heads trained on aggregate preferences, using few target examples to outperform uniform averaging and prior methods on RewardBench and 32 tasks.

TrustLLM: Trustworthiness in Large Language Models

cs.CL · 2024-01-10 · unverdicted · novelty 5.0

TrustLLM defines eight trustworthiness principles, creates a six-dimension benchmark, and evaluates 16 LLMs showing proprietary models generally lead but some open-source ones are close while over-calibration can hurt utility.

Risk Reporting for Developers' Internal AI Model Use

cs.CY · 2026-04-27 · unverdicted · novelty 4.0

A harmonized risk reporting standard for internal frontier AI model use, structured around autonomous misbehavior and insider threats using means, motive, and opportunity factors.

Qualixar OS: A Universal Operating System for AI Agent Orchestration

cs.AI · 2026-04-07 · unverdicted · novelty 4.0

Qualixar OS provides a runtime for multi-agent AI systems with support for 12 topologies, LLM-driven team design, dynamic routing, consensus judging, content attribution, and protocol bridging, achieving 100% accuracy on a custom 20-task suite at $0.000039 mean cost per task.

citing papers explorer

Showing 25 of 25 citing papers.