OMIBench benchmark reveals that current LVLMs achieve at most 50% on Olympiad problems requiring reasoning across multiple images.
Evaluating mllms with multimodal multi-image reasoning benchmark
3 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
3
Pith papers citing it
citation-role summary
background 2
citation-polarity summary
years
2026 3verdicts
UNVERDICTED 3roles
background 2polarities
background 2representative citing papers
Multimodal LLMs significantly underperform humans at spotting objects that break 3D consistency in multi-view image pairs.
DT2IT-MRM proposes a debiased preference construction pipeline, T2I data reformulation, and iterative training to curate multimodal preference data, achieving SOTA on VL-RewardBench, Multimodal RewardBench, and MM-RLHF-RewardBench.
citing papers explorer
-
OMIBench: Benchmarking Olympiad-Level Multi-Image Reasoning in Large Vision-Language Model
OMIBench benchmark reveals that current LVLMs achieve at most 50% on Olympiad problems requiring reasoning across multiple images.
-
Multimodal Language Models Cannot Spot Spatial Inconsistencies
Multimodal LLMs significantly underperform humans at spotting objects that break 3D consistency in multi-view image pairs.
-
DT2IT-MRM: Debiased Preference Construction and Iterative Training for Multimodal Reward Modeling
DT2IT-MRM proposes a debiased preference construction pipeline, T2I data reformulation, and iterative training to curate multimodal preference data, achieving SOTA on VL-RewardBench, Multimodal RewardBench, and MM-RLHF-RewardBench.