RL fine-tuning of LLMs improves clean-benchmark accuracy while degrading accuracy under three injected-distractor evaluation scenarios, though one of the three scenarios contradicts the headline claim.
Anti-Overestimation Dialogue Policy Learning for Task-Completion Dialogue System
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
A dialogue policy module is an essential part of task-completion dialogue systems. Recently, increasing interest has focused on reinforcement learning (RL)-based dialogue policy. Its favorable performance and wise action decisions rely on an accurate estimation of action values. The overestimation problem is a widely known issue of RL since its estimate of the maximum action value is larger than the ground truth, which results in an unstable learning process and suboptimal policy. This problem is detrimental to RL-based dialogue policy learning. To mitigate this problem, this paper proposes a dynamic partial average estimator (DPAV) of the ground truth maximum action value. DPAV calculates the partial average between the predicted maximum action value and minimum action value, where the weights are dynamically adaptive and problem-dependent. We incorporate DPAV into a deep Q-network as the dialogue policy and show that our method can achieve better or comparable results compared to top baselines on three dialogue datasets of different domains with a lower computational load. In addition, we also theoretically prove the convergence and derive the upper and lower bounds of the bias compared with those of other methods.
fields
cs.AI 1years
2025 1verdicts
REJECT 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Large Language Models Reasoning Abilities Under Non-Ideal Conditions After RL-Fine-Tuning
RL fine-tuning of LLMs improves clean-benchmark accuracy while degrading accuracy under three injected-distractor evaluation scenarios, though one of the three scenarios contradicts the headline claim.