Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Anti-Overestimation Dialogue Policy Learning for Task-Completion Dialogue System

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2207.11762 v2 pith:JWWLFYNH submitted 2022-07-24 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords dialogueactionpolicylearningvaluedpavmaximumproblem
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

A dialogue policy module is an essential part of task-completion dialogue systems. Recently, increasing interest has focused on reinforcement learning (RL)-based dialogue policy. Its favorable performance and wise action decisions rely on an accurate estimation of action values. The overestimation problem is a widely known issue of RL since its estimate of the maximum action value is larger than the ground truth, which results in an unstable learning process and suboptimal policy. This problem is detrimental to RL-based dialogue policy learning. To mitigate this problem, this paper proposes a dynamic partial average estimator (DPAV) of the ground truth maximum action value. DPAV calculates the partial average between the predicted maximum action value and minimum action value, where the weights are dynamically adaptive and problem-dependent. We incorporate DPAV into a deep Q-network as the dialogue policy and show that our method can achieve better or comparable results compared to top baselines on three dialogue datasets of different domains with a lower computational load. In addition, we also theoretically prove the convergence and derive the upper and lower bounds of the bias compared with those of other methods.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Large Language Models Reasoning Abilities Under Non-Ideal Conditions After RL-Fine-Tuning

    cs.AI 2025-08 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    RL fine-tuning of LLMs improves clean-benchmark accuracy while degrading accuracy under three injected-distractor evaluation scenarios, though one of the three scenarios contradicts the headline claim.

Pith tools