Pith. sign in

A practical guide to feedback control for Pound-Drever-Hall laser linewidth narrowing

1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

1 Pith paper citing it
abstract

The Pound-Drever-Hall (PDH) technique for laser linewidth narrowing is widely used by AMO experimentalists. However, achieving a high-performance PDH locking requires substantial engineering experience, which is scattered across literature and often lacks a cohesive control-theory perspective. Excellent pedagogical papers exist on the theory of the PDH error signal but they rarely cover feedback control. General-purpose control theory literature seldom discuss PDH laser locking specifically. Although excellent PDH review articles provide thorough knowledge and practice on both aspects but they are not reader-friendly. We extend prior works by addressing component choice and loop tuning using modern tools like a vector network analyzer. We organize multifaceted engineering considerations systematically, grounded in feedback control principles. Our target reader is researchers setting up a PDH laser lock for the first time; we eschew advanced topics like minimizing residual amplitude modulation (RAM). Our guidance is illustrated by step-by-step optimization of the lock for a 1650 nm ECDL.

citation-role summary

background 1

citation-polarity summary

fields

quant-ph 1

years

2025 1

verdicts

CONDITIONAL 1

roles

background 1

polarities

unclear 1

representative citing papers

Can TCOs Transform Cavity-QED?

quant-ph · 2025-06-03 · conditional · novelty 6.0

A 30 nm ZnO transparent conductor enables a high-finesse Fabry-Perot cavity at 1650 nm with about 5000 times lower loss than ITO, potentially solving surface-charging problems in cavity-QED.

citing papers explorer

Showing 1 of 1 citing paper.

  • Can TCOs Transform Cavity-QED? quant-ph · 2025-06-03 · conditional · none · ref 85 · internal anchor

    A 30 nm ZnO transparent conductor enables a high-finesse Fabry-Perot cavity at 1650 nm with about 5000 times lower loss than ITO, potentially solving surface-charging problems in cavity-QED.