Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

A practical guide to feedback control for Pound-Drever-Hall laser linewidth narrowing

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2412.04635 v2 pith:72A7QKQV submitted 2024-12-05 quant-ph physics.atom-phphysics.optics

classification quant-phphysics.atom-phphysics.optics
keywords controllaserfeedbackengineeringexcellentlikelinewidthliterature
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The Pound-Drever-Hall (PDH) technique for laser linewidth narrowing is widely used by AMO experimentalists. However, achieving a high-performance PDH locking requires substantial engineering experience, which is scattered across literature and often lacks a cohesive control-theory perspective. Excellent pedagogical papers exist on the theory of the PDH error signal but they rarely cover feedback control. General-purpose control theory literature seldom discuss PDH laser locking specifically. Although excellent PDH review articles provide thorough knowledge and practice on both aspects but they are not reader-friendly. We extend prior works by addressing component choice and loop tuning using modern tools like a vector network analyzer. We organize multifaceted engineering considerations systematically, grounded in feedback control principles. Our target reader is researchers setting up a PDH laser lock for the first time; we eschew advanced topics like minimizing residual amplitude modulation (RAM). Our guidance is illustrated by step-by-step optimization of the lock for a 1650 nm ECDL.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Can TCOs Transform Cavity-QED?

    quant-ph 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A 30 nm ZnO transparent conductor enables a high-finesse Fabry-Perot cavity at 1650 nm with about 5000 times lower loss than ITO, potentially solving surface-charging problems in cavity-QED.

Pith tools