pith. sign in

Learning to Configure Agentic AI Systems

1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

1 Pith paper citing it
abstract

Configuring LLM-based agent systems involves choosing workflows, tools, token budgets, and prompts from a large combinatorial design space, and is typically handled today by fixed templates or hand-tuned heuristics that apply the same configuration regardless of query difficulty, leading to brittle behavior and wasted compute. To address this, we formulate agent configuration as a semi-Markov decision process (SMDP) where each configuration acts as a temporally extended option that determines how an agent system processes a query, and introduce introduce ARC (Agentic Resource & Configuration learner), a lightweight hierarchical policy that dynamically selects query-specific agent configurations. Across reasoning, tool-use, and agentic benchmarks, ARC consistently improves over budget-matched tool-augmented LLMs, increasing average reasoning accuracy by 31.3%, tool-use accuracy by 13.95%, and doubling {\tau}-Bench (Airline) Pass^1 success from 9.0% to 18.0%. These results demonstrate that learning per-query agent configurations is a powerful alternative to "one size fits all" designs.

fields

cs.LG 1

years

2026 1

verdicts

UNVERDICTED 1

representative citing papers

citing papers explorer

Showing 1 of 1 citing paper.

  • Knowing When to Ask: Segment-Level Credit Assignment for LLM Tool Use cs.LG · 2026-05-27 · unverdicted · none · ref 3 · internal anchor

    CARL trains a critic for segment-level credit assignment from binary outcomes in LLM tool-use trajectories, yielding 6.7-9.7 point accuracy gains and 53% fewer calls on solvable questions across five benchmarks.