In an online video study, people rated antisocial robot behavior as least acceptable, preferred handover over table placement, and judged collaborations with older adults more sensitively.
Doing Right by Not Doing Wrong in Human-Robot Collaboration
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
As robotic systems become more and more capable of assisting humans in their everyday lives, we must consider the opportunities for these artificial agents to make their human collaborators feel unsafe or to treat them unfairly. Robots can exhibit antisocial behavior causing physical harm to people or reproduce unfair behavior replicating and even amplifying historical and societal biases which are detrimental to humans they interact with. In this paper, we discuss these issues considering sociable robotic manipulation and fair robotic decision making. We propose a novel approach to learning fair and sociable behavior, not by reproducing positive behavior, but rather by avoiding negative behavior. In this study, we highlight the importance of incorporating sociability in robot manipulation, as well as the need to consider fairness in human-robot interactions.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
fields
cs.RO 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1roles
background 1polarities
unclear 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Designing for Difference: How Human Characteristics Shape Perceptions of Collaborative Robots
In an online video study, people rated antisocial robot behavior as least acceptable, preferred handover over table placement, and judged collaborations with older adults more sensitively.