REVIEW 2 cited by
Doing Right by Not Doing Wrong in Human-Robot Collaboration
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
As robotic systems become more and more capable of assisting humans in their everyday lives, we must consider the opportunities for these artificial agents to make their human collaborators feel unsafe or to treat them unfairly. Robots can exhibit antisocial behavior causing physical harm to people or reproduce unfair behavior replicating and even amplifying historical and societal biases which are detrimental to humans they interact with. In this paper, we discuss these issues considering sociable robotic manipulation and fair robotic decision making. We propose a novel approach to learning fair and sociable behavior, not by reproducing positive behavior, but rather by avoiding negative behavior. In this study, we highlight the importance of incorporating sociability in robot manipulation, as well as the need to consider fairness in human-robot interactions.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Designing for Difference: How Human Characteristics Shape Perceptions of Collaborative Robots
In an online video study, people rated antisocial robot behavior as least acceptable, preferred handover over table placement, and judged collaborations with older adults more sensitively.
-
Human-Centered Reflections on Care Robots: A Comparative Study of Caregiver Perspectives
Caregivers across the US, Mexico, and Chile accept care robots mostly for logistics and physical assistance, while preferring human oversight for relational tasks.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.