Pith. sign in

On Model Protection in Federated Learning against Eavesdropping Attacks

1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

1 Pith paper citing it
abstract

In this study, we investigate the protection offered by federated learning algorithms against eavesdropping adversaries. In our model, the adversary is capable of intercepting model updates transmitted from clients to the server, enabling it to create its own estimate of the model. Unlike previous research, which predominantly focuses on safeguarding client data, our work shifts attention protecting the client model itself. Through a theoretical analysis, we examine how various factors, such as the probability of client selection, the structure of local objective functions, global aggregation at the server, and the eavesdropper's capabilities, impact the overall level of protection. We further validate our findings through numerical experiments, assessing the protection by evaluating the model accuracy achieved by the adversary. Finally, we compare our results with methods based on differential privacy, underscoring their limitations in this specific context.

citation-role summary

background 1

citation-polarity summary

fields

cs.LG 1

years

2026 1

verdicts

CONDITIONAL 1

roles

background 1

polarities

unclear 1

representative citing papers

MaxModShift: Model Privacy via Designed Shifts

cs.LG · 2026-08-10 · conditional · novelty 5.0

A shift design that maximizes the eavesdropper's final model error under a power constraint is derived for federated learning, with simulations showing better privacy than ModShift at 24% of its power.

citing papers explorer

Showing 1 of 1 citing paper.

  • MaxModShift: Model Privacy via Designed Shifts cs.LG · 2026-08-10 · conditional · none · ref 9 · internal anchor

    A shift design that maximizes the eavesdropper's final model error under a power constraint is derived for federated learning, with simulations showing better privacy than ModShift at 24% of its power.