REVIEW 2 cited by
On Model Protection in Federated Learning against Eavesdropping Attacks
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
In this study, we investigate the protection offered by federated learning algorithms against eavesdropping adversaries. In our model, the adversary is capable of intercepting model updates transmitted from clients to the server, enabling it to create its own estimate of the model. Unlike previous research, which predominantly focuses on safeguarding client data, our work shifts attention protecting the client model itself. Through a theoretical analysis, we examine how various factors, such as the probability of client selection, the structure of local objective functions, global aggregation at the server, and the eavesdropper's capabilities, impact the overall level of protection. We further validate our findings through numerical experiments, assessing the protection by evaluating the model accuracy achieved by the adversary. Finally, we compare our results with methods based on differential privacy, underscoring their limitations in this specific context.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
MaxModShift: Model Privacy via Designed Shifts
A shift design that maximizes the eavesdropper's final model error under a power constraint is derived for federated learning, with simulations showing better privacy than ModShift at 24% of its power.
-
ModShift: Model Privacy via Designed Shifts
Designed shifts that make the eavesdropper's Fisher information matrix singular hide one component of a federated model from network eavesdroppers.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.