Users show curiosity over concern toward LLM inferences of personal information, with acceptability depending on context, alignment with expectations, and who uses the inferences rather than just the content.
Response-Aware User Memory Selection for LLM Personalization
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
A common approach to personalization in large language models (LLMs) is to incorporate a subset of the user memory into the prompt at inference time to guide the model's generation. Existing methods select these subsets primarily using similarity between user memory items and input queries, ignoring how features actually affect the model's response distribution. We propose Response-Utility optimization for Memory Selection (RUMS), a novel method that selects user memory items by measuring the mutual information between a subset of memory and the model's outputs, identifying items that reduce response uncertainty and sharpen predictions beyond semantic similarity. We demonstrate that this information-theoretic foundation enables more principled user memory selection that aligns more closely with human selection compared to state-of-the-art methods, and models $400\times$ larger. Additionally, we show that memory items selected using RUMS result in better response quality compared to existing approaches, while having up to $95\%$ reduction in computational cost.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
fields
cs.HC 1years
2026 1verdicts
UNVERDICTED 1roles
background 1polarities
background 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
When Are LLM Inferences Acceptable? User Reactions and Control Preferences for Inferred Personal Information
Users show curiosity over concern toward LLM inferences of personal information, with acceptability depending on context, alignment with expectations, and who uses the inferences rather than just the content.